If it wasn't enough for society to stereotype human bodies...

[numberland]

I've found a circumstance of this for cats, both sexes are horribly thin but female cats DO NOT HAVE BREASTS!!!!, nor a longer neck, in fact they are rather similar so why do you have them differentiated at all?

Comments

[i-am-toast.livejournal.com]

The female cat has the Ms title as part of the design and the male cat has Mr, so you can put the surnames of the guests in yourself and have personalised napkin rings. I think they're probably slightly different - and handed - to go with the traditional boy-girl-boy-girl seating, which I imagine would be at play at any dinner party sufficently tosspotish to have customised napkin holders, but have no sexual characteristics because the sex mentioned refers to guest not cat.

[numberland]

There are many issues with the whole set up (non-binary people, Drs etc) but I was referring to differences in the cat's body shape, most notably that the female cat has a bulge where breasts would be if cats had breasts.

[(Anonymous)]

I must admit I think that's stretching it a bit - there's a bump, yes, but to claim it's a breast when it's a bit of a blob with no real resemblance to tits whatsoever is a bit daft. I'd actually taken your comment entirely the other way - that you were shocked there was so little biological definition.

[numberland]

I'm really not interesting in debating this. I am not saying that from the female figure alone it is clear they are meant to be breasts but that there is a difference between the male and female models which given it is a difference can then be interpreted as such.